In this paper, we demonstrated the efficiency of each geophysical technique available for solving subsurface engineering problems, leading to future improvements in site safety. GPR data at the Riyadh site were acquired using the RAMAC system with a 100 MHz shielded antenna attached to a GPS with real-time kinematic total station equipment GPR data confirmed the possible presence of cavities at different depths, which may cause severe damage during building construction. ![]() GPR data visualized using an isosurface rendering combined with inverted ERT allowed us to identify and follow the fracture system, which was mainly filled with low-resistivity sediment such fractured limestone may cause landslides. At the Egyptian site, GPR data were acquired with a GSSI SIR2000 system using a 400 MHz shielded antenna with 0.2 m in-line spacing. While only GPR was available to investigate an engineering site of about 200 × 300 m, located in Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia, for cavity detection. An integrated survey, including GPR and ERT, was used for mapping and evaluating a complex subsurface fracture network in Eocene limestone at Al-Mokattam site, Egypt. ground-penetrating radar (GPR) and electric resistivity tomography (ERT)), continue to enable great possibilities for 3-D visualization of fractures and cavities. Near-surface geophysical techniques, (i.e.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |